The fault In Our Classrooms
Image source: Google images
Language is often taught to children in an unimaginative and inadequate ways throughout the classrooms in India and I believe that it one of the most striking issues that Indian Education System is facing today. From my practical experience in various private schools, govt. schools, tribal schools, I have observed that most of the children are not able to internalize and apply the basic concepts of Math and science.
The focus of early language and literacy in these classrooms
is only limited to the mechanical transfer of script knowledge to children- the
endless presentation of aksharas, their
combination to form words, phrases, sentences and finally passages. I have
usually observed teachers practicing typically two kinds of strategies in the
classroom:-
> Asking children to copy write the words or aksharas or “answers” from the board
> Or the teacher sometimes dictate the answers to the students.
In such a scenario there’s hardly any room for meaningful discussions and conversations. Reading and writing are taught and learned without a sense of relevance or connect between the word and the world of the child. (Friere & Macedo, 1987).
> Asking children to copy write the words or aksharas or “answers” from the board
> Or the teacher sometimes dictate the answers to the students.
In such a scenario there’s hardly any room for meaningful discussions and conversations. Reading and writing are taught and learned without a sense of relevance or connect between the word and the world of the child. (Friere & Macedo, 1987).
What does it mean to be a literate individual? If the goal
of the education system is to teach children sign their names or teach them to
read and write basic texts with accuracy then perhaps we can continue to do so
by teaching children mainly aksharas, word,
sentence and passage reading as described earlier. And stop there. But it is
possible for some of us to have an expanded vision where we would not want
people to learn the script in minimalistic ways, but we’d like them to
understand what they’re reading and writing, and make them realize its
relevance in their lives. We’d like them to use, critique and navigate written
words effectively. This is my idea of what it means to educate a literate
individual for our society. Hence, keeping this vision in mind the use of
children’s literature books in the classroom doesn’t become optional but
central to the curriculum. Higher-order thinking skills, comprehension, writing
for a purpose, nuanced understandings of the vocabulary and syntax are all
related to rich exposure, wide reading and deep engagement with the literate
discourses.
Currently, I have seen and observed that most of the
classrooms are dominated by textbooks and worksheets. Many of these materials
carry an implicit assumption that children aren’t capable enough to think about
complex issues and therefore they must just be limited to mastering the script,
learning small rhymes and reading small passages which they rarely identify to
or find them relevant to their daily lives. If children’s literature is brought
into the classroom, teacher and children alike can have meaningful discussions
around the topics which children can resonate with e.g. Friendship, family,
life, loss, human-animal relationship etc.) The educators will also get the
opportunity to introduce topics of societal and cultural relevance to the
children which they can connect with or which they might not have thought on
their own. This will also acquaint the children with some aesthetic
sensibilities of language use, metaphors, art in the picture books, language
play etc. It also gives enough space to consider, which kind of narration they
find more effective? How does the style of writing changes across genres? And
so on. These kind of opportunities help develop skills, attitudes
and knowledge bases in children that act as a fulcrum in expanding the vision
of literacy that aims to develop individuals who are capable enough to
critique, navigate and use the written words effectively.
Learning to read? Or
reading to learn? these two questions have been bothering me since many
years and are still revolving around the dark point of stillness. After
reflecting on it for days and months, I figured that there cannot be any
distinction between these two because “Learning to read” will always result in
“reading to learn”. There is no separation between the two. When a child enters
school for the first time especially the first generation school-goer, he/she
has to learn not just the mechanics but also values, literate attitudes,
knowledge and skills. Why should the small child invest so many hours of his
life in mastering the written word? What relevance does it hold to his/her
life? All this a part of “learning to read” is a part of “learning to become a
reader” and developing a literate identity. I feel that well-chosen and well
used literature can help children establish connect between the written word
and the written world. This will help children extensively in figuring out the
various styles and types of narratives. This will also help them understand how
the language can be used in a variety of ways for a variety of purposes. This
will help the children to develop “Concepts
of Print”, How to hold a book, where to begin reading, which direction the
print moves in etc. all of this is constituent of “learning to read”, which is
extensively supported by the literature. And similarly it’ll also include
“Reading to learn”, about societies, cultures, people, places etc. What will it
Not include is- learning to decode
the script. Mastering the script is very important part of a language and
literacy curriculum.
I read about the “Block” approach in one of my pedagogy
classes where the teachers can follow to plan their language class. The
teachers here can dedicate some amount of time teaching children to master the
script. To give students practice with reading connected texts for which they
can use small, easy readers. However the teacher must not try to use literature
to teach script level knowledge as it will obstruct the process of mastering
the script and the literatures quality will also go down.
Lastly, I’d just like to suggest few simple solutions which
I think are suitable to the problem being discussed in this write up-
Reading Aloud – Talking is often discouraged in the Indian
classrooms. As against this, research suggests that classroom is a great place
for sharing ideas and productive TALK around books and several other topics
that in turn create conditions for children to develop their oral language.
Through read aloud the teacher also demonstrates how a good reader reads texts,
with expressions and voice modulations, re-reading when confused, looking ahead
or trying to predict what is going to happen next etc.
Literature
Discussions- It is very important to set aside some time for the literary
discussion to happen. This activity will help develop appreciation for
literature. The teacher may try to relate the text and form a connect to
child’s life. Also she/he may also help him analyse, critique or ask the child
to respond to the text in a number of ways. Children can respond to the text
through art, drama or early invented writing attempts.
Writing – Currently
educators only teach children to copy-write, form and spell aksharas perfectly. I think we would need to incorporate “Guided
writing” where the teacher can expose them to good writing models and they must
also try to free them from the burden of making spelling mistakes etc.

Hi, your site is very interesting.
ReplyDeleteJobs for Pregnant Women